THE
ECONOMY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
We are witnessing the
proliferation of large construction projects in the main cities of the
country: malls, housing projects, roads, and developments, just to mention a
few. The birth and the growth of these considerable investments on
infrastructure become, from the perspective of the present economic model,
fundamental symbols to say that El Salvador has gone into a new phase of
expansion and development. This “progressive” vision tries to say that in
spite of the war and the economic problems and situations, the country is
now better than it was a decade ago and that the Salvadorans should keep
working hard in order to be part of this improvement.
This speech seems to be extremely optimistic since it forgets one of the
essential aspects for the development of a nation in the long-term: the
environment. Now, more than ever, the present economic model is causing a
serious damage to nature. Strangely enough, the damages caused to the
environment are not perceived by the population because the citizens think
that development is something connected with the economy. For instance, for
a considerable part of the population the indiscriminate felling of trees is
not a problem due to the need to build new houses for more families. In the
same way, the pollution created by the industry is justified because
companies create jobs and the jobs provide the income of the workers.
The perverse effect in the environment of the economic decisions about
production and consumption are seen, in the best of the cases, as “necessary
negative aspects” that people have to accept in search of our own good. From
this neoliberal perspective, this kind of welfare is connected to the
concept of consumption, which finds its quintessential expression in the
construction of the shopping malls that do not generate an added value for
the economy. The construction of these cathedrals of consumption is the
result of the depredation of several forests in this country.
In El Salvador, the hacienda “El Espino” is one of the most important areas
from an environmental perspective. In spite of this, it has not escaped from
the destructive logic of the present economic model since right now is being
transformed in a commercial area of enormous dimensions. The construction of
the Hyper Mall Las Cascadas was finished last year, a project mainly
financed with Guatemalan investments. Presently, one of the most important
shopping malls of Central America is being built. In addition, between the
space occupied by the Hyper Mall Las Cascadas and the Universtity José
Matías Delgado, another edifice is being built, and no one knows what it is
for. According to those that promote the present economic model, this is a
positive thing because it tells us that the country is managing to find a
“development strategy”, since shopping malls are essential to create new job
opportunities for the Salvadoran population.
The Development Program of The United Nations (PNUD, in Spanish) explained
in its report of the Human Development in El Salvador 2003 that, from 1993
to 2001, the green areas of the country have increased its arboreal density.
However, in the most important cities of the country, this environmental
variable has been considerably reduced. This damage to the quality of the
environment could be due to the growing number of families that gather
around the periphery of the most important cities of the country because
they do not find an economic alternative in the rural areas. The present
economic model has created a series of changes that bring along an
environmental destruction. It is necessary to develop an efficient mechanism
to reduce the impact that these concentrations of people have over the
environment, and, in the best of the cases, neutralize the events that
create these concentrations.
A different vision of development is the “sustainable development”
perspective, something that can be defined as “a development that satisfies
the needs of the present without putting in danger the capacity of the
future generations in order to fulfill their own needs”. In other words, to
create a sustainable development for a country is to support all of those
economic activities that satisfy the present needs without destroying the
natural resources, in order that the future generations are able to use such
resources. If these generations cannot fulfill their needs, this is an
obstacle for a true development. It could be a short-term development, and
even if a nation counts with a considerable amount of natural resources it
can only be considered a medium-term development. However, that particular
way of development cannot last for the long-term, because it undermines one
of the most important resources: nature.
In order to achieve higher goals, the State should play an important role in
society. The law of the Environment was created many years ago. There is
also a Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources. However, this
Ministry leaves a lot to be desired in the way it administrates the law. The
country does not have a coherent environmental policy able to meet the needs
of the territory. It is true that it is necessary to make a bet for the
economic growth, but there should also be a certain balance between this
economic development and the importance of preserving the natural resources.
It is necessary to create a higher level of added value, new jobs, and new
business opportunities that, in the end, do not become part of a chain of
destruction for the future generations.
All of these ideas lead us to re-consider if the proliferation of the
shopping malls is an adequate parameter to observe the development of El
Salvador. The economic development of a country should not be seen
exclusively through an economic perspective, but though a multidimensional
point of view. This is one way to satisfy the material and the spiritual
needs of the people, as long as the environment is respected.
Everything seems to indicate that it is necessary to make some adjustments
to the economic model. The solution to this problem is not to “profit” from
the elements of nature, as many Neoclassical economists intend to believe.
In other words, the solution is not to give a specific price to all the
elements of nature. Some people believe that if they put a price to nature,
whoever produces or buys this kind of resources should pay for them.
Therefore, they will not be encouraged to take advantage of those elements
from nature. That is not the solution, because the hunger of the business
companies will always end up purchasing those resources to use them for
production. The solution is to protect the available resources, renew them,
and think of new ways of production that can be compatible with the
environment.
The Ministry of the Environment has a very serious commitment, that is, to
work hard for the preservation of nature. That is why it is necessary to
readjust the logic of the present economic model. It is clear that nature is
not important for this model. Nature has become just a way to obtain profits,
and some people tend to forget that our surroundings and that the place
where we live in is our home, and that the essential aspects of life depend
on the environment.
|