The
fiscal Reform, the Free Trade Agreement, and the social welfare
One hundred days after the
presidential inauguration, the economic heading begins to be outlined like
the angular stone of the challenges that this administration will have to
face. It is hardly a little more than three months of work, and certainly,
in such a short period of time the results of the implementation of the
economic policies cannot be evaluated; however, the guidelines of those
policies can be definitively examined. The intention of this commentary is
to evaluate the economic performance of the beginnings of the new
presidential management, and to examine the feasibility to face, with these
strategies, the challenges of the next five years.
In this sense, when evaluating the direction of Saca’s governmental plan
through the undertaken actions, it is possible to see three factors that
determine the profile of the present administration in the economic field:
1) The government has to fulfill the promises that were made in regard to
the social matters. Nevertheless, when carrying out the plans with an
inflexible budgetary restriction imposed by the enormous national debt,
there is a very small margin to make substantial changes. The answer to the
increasing social needs of the population is a fiscal reform, that will be
the main challenge for Saca in his first year. The difficulties will become
even more critical, if the interests of the business sector are taken into
account, because their strategy is to make sure that the tax rates are
always on their side.
2) The economic policy of the present government intends to extend the
policies of commercial liberalization and the openness of the markets even
more than the previous administration did. The last period put all of its
efforts on the Free Trade Agreements, which were conceived as lifesavers
that would enable the country to grow, create more jobs, improve the
competitiveness, increase the investment levels, and introduce new
technology.
3) The search for the social welfare is the worse contradiction of the
economic policy. In order to achieve a social success, it is necessary to
count with economic policies in which the less fortunate ones appear as the
main beneficiaries. Nevertheless, the reform that is being outlined does not
contemplate the existence of progressive taxes. No agrarian reforms have
been outlined, nor any structural plans to create decent sources of
employment (different from the ones obtained through the present Free Trade
Agreement).
According to the document of the Ministry of Economy, “Productive and
Commercial Challenges and Opportunities 2004-2009”, from the beginning, this
area of the State has established the following items:
1. The consolidation of the commercial openness.
2. The advantage of the commercial treaties to promote competitiveness.
3. The strengthening of the internal market.
4. The decentralization of the economic activity.
Each one of these sections contains precise economic policies aimed to reach
specific goals. The problem is that to carry out those goals, along with the
search to strengthen the productive sectors, seems like a contradiction
because of the limited resources of the country. Just like the countries of
Southeast Asia did it at a certain time, to establish a market platform
abroad on the base of a Free Trade Agreement demands a record of excellent
productivity levels, state of the art technology, and efficiency, as well as
national plans to strengthen the productive sectors. In countries such as
Taiwan, South Korea and Japan, it was necessary to establish a consensus
between the productive sectors and, mainly, a National Plan designed for the
long term. That is why the different business sectors of these countries
accepted the fiscal pressure of austerity, the agrarian reform and other
necessary structural changes for their development.
This way, when observing our most important productive areas (the land and
the industry) it is not necessary to make that many analyses to understand
that the country does not count with a suitable preparation to compete
abroad, since it is necessary to invest millions in these sectors so that
they have “enough quality and creativity” in order that the exports become a
successful strategy, and the State is not concentrating much of its
attention on that fact. What is important to them is to sign the Free Trade
Agreement, and then think how they will be able to take advantage of it.
During this period, those that can take advantage of our market turn out to
be those that destroy the micro and small business companies of subsistence,
those that are not prepared to compete in these circumstances.
If for 2003, according to the information provided by the Central Bank of
Reserve (BCR, in Spanish), the growth oscillated between 1.8% and 2% and the
GNP per capita remained suspended in time for its fourth consecutive year,
in spite of the efforts made by the last administrations to sign more Free
Trade Agreements; then, why the productivity of the country has not been
reactivated? The growth of the first trimester (2004) reached 1.6%, that is,
2% less than the one it reached the same period for 2002, (1.8%). The
farming sector and the sector of services grew by 1.7% and 1.6%,
respectively, and these were the only ones that grew if compared with the
fourth trimester of 2003. The reduction is much more intense if the first
trimester of 2004 is compared with the same period for 2003. After the
earthquakes, the construction sector is the one that has been losing more
and more in terms of growth, because even if for the first trimester of 2003
it reached 6.7%, for the same period, in 2004, it only grew by 1%.
The heel of Achilles: the fiscal problem
If to reanimate an economy with limited resources is a difficult task, to do
it with responsibility, fairness and justice is even more difficult. The
2004 viability is guaranteed with the State’s budget approved on last June,
but, what are the intentions of the Saca administration in reference to the
2005 budget? What is the fiscal plan that will be followed to respond to the
social problems?
In the first place, it is clear that the budget’s deficit will be financed
for 2005 with bonds only. The Ministry of Hacienda (the Internal Revenue
Service) has confirmed that they are not allowed to negotiate new credits.
Fiscal prudence seems to be the philosophy of the Ministry of Hacienda. They
are looking for a policy of austerity and no indebtedness with the
international organisms.
How can this be done? The conclusion of the analysts is that the margin for
the financial maneuvers is extremely small. For example, between all of the
organizations that receive State resources, only four have been chosen to
receive a budgetary increase in 2005: Health, Education, Governance and ANDA
(The National Administration of Aqueducts and Sewers). Nevertheless, if the
increases are compared with “the amount of promises”, this plan does not
seem that coherent after all. According to the Minister of Hacienda,
Guillermo Lopez Suárez, the 2005 budget will bring more than the $2.793
million approved for this year. Even so, no ministry is authorized to hire
new people or to increase the wages, with the exception of the Direction of
Penal Centers, which will be able to hire more personnel.
The great bet of the Ministry of Hacienda is that all of these expenses can
be financed, almost exclusively, by the taxes that the people pay. The
problem is that the amount of collected taxes has decreased in reference to
the national goals, especially the value added tax (IVA, in Spanish). The
Ministry of Hacienda intends to obtain for 2005 12,6% of the GNP in taxes,
that is $15.678,6 million. In other words, in 2005 they expect to collect a
little more than $1.958 million in taxes, without applying the fiscal reform.
If the reform planned in the Executive is approved, the predictions are that
the State Treasury could modify the budget and would collect approximately
$109 million more, which is the goal for the first year that will adopt the
reform. However, while that option is created, the alternative is to obtain
more income through the bonds’ financing. The Ministry of Hacienda has
confirmed that they are planning to issue bonds aimed to make pressure on
the country’s national debt to 40% of the GNP. This last action would even
exceed the issuing of the approved debt for this year. The Ministry of
Hacienda indicates that the debt has reached 37.9% of the GNP, that is,
$5,942 million. That, theoretically speaking, leaves a margin to become
indebted with an amount of bonds close to $329 million for 2005. With these
bonds, they intend to take care of the subject regarding the retirement
pensions, which for 2005 has a budget of $370 million, and the regular
expenses. The public investment will remain the same for 2005 with an amount
similar to the one of the present year ($496 million).
There are some examples about the ministries that will not be able to meet
the expectations of income and investments, but the one that has attracted
more attention is the new Ministry of Tourism. In the 2005 budget, this
institution expects to count with $7,4 million to finance its activities.
This amount is usually distributed between the Salvadoran Institute of
Tourism (ISTU, in Spanish), and the Salvadoran Corporation of Tourism (CORSATUR,
in Spanish) and the new Ministry of Tourism; but according to the Minister
of Tourism, Luis Cardinal, the amount is not enough to fulfill the minimum
of the agreed projects, such as the restoration and maintenance of the
tourists’ centers, which could easily cost twice as much as the pre-established
amount.
The government refuses to substantially increase the resources assigned to
the farming sector. During the last years, the budgetary ceiling of the
Ministry of Agriculture has not exceeded $36 million in average, and 2005,
according to what the plan seems to be, will not be the exception. What has
been requested for this ministry is to increase the destined amount by $8
million. Nevertheless, the Ministry of Hacienda has allowed them to increase
the budget only by $500,000.
President Saca said, when talking about the profile of his administration
regarding the tax issues: “we spoke about not increasing the income tax
level of contribution, about not increasing the IVA, and to increase the
specific taxes such as the FOSALUD and to close the fiscal gaps”. Perhaps in
that phrase the present fiscal problem can be summed up: the Minister of
Hacienda, Guillermo Lopez Suárez, drafted a document with seventy proposals
for several reforms. One of these reforms establishes the obligatory nature
of the contributors’ patrimonial declaration, and the establishment of taxes
for the interests that the banks from abroad make. These last proposals were
rejected since the beginning because they affect the interests of the
country’s business elite. Without the State’s support, neither unemployment
nor the poverty level will change significantly in the agricultural sector.
Unemployment forces more than 70 thousand Salvadorans to leave the country
every year to go and look for opportunities abroad, while more than half of
the population is poor, and 25% live in misery. That is why, theoretically
speaking, the fiscal policy would have to be centered in an expansive
foundation in order to reactivate the productive sectors, but through
truthful economic and social reforms.
|